Indian cricketer Mohammed Shami has found himself at the center of a heated debate after choosing not to observe Roza (fasting) during the Champions Trophy semi-final against Australia at the Dubai International Cricket Stadium. The 34-year-old pacer was seen drinking an energy drink during the match, sparking criticism from some quarters but also drawing strong support from others.
The controversy escalated when Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Bareilvi, President of the All India Muslim Jamaat, accused Shami of committing a “crime” for not keeping the fast during Ramzan.
“One of the compulsory duties in Islam is ‘Roza’. If a healthy man or woman doesn’t observe it, they are considered a criminal in the eyes of Shariat. Mohammed Shami drank water during the match, and this sends the wrong message to people,” Maulana Bareilvi told ANI.
In response, Congress leader Shama Mohamed stepped forward to defend Shami, emphasizing the flexibility within Islamic teachings when it comes to fasting during travel or physically demanding situations like sports.
“In Islam, there is a very important principle during Ramzan — when you are traveling, you are not obligated to fast. Mohammed Shami was not at home; he was playing an intense cricket match, which can make anyone thirsty. Islam is a scientific religion, and at the end of the day, it is your deeds that truly matter,” Shama told ANI.
Her remarks highlight a broader understanding of religious practices, stressing that Islam provides allowances for individuals facing challenging circumstances — including athletes competing at the highest level.
Shami, a crucial part of Team India’s bowling attack, has remained focused on his game despite the controversy. His performance in the Champions Trophy has earned praise, with fans rallying behind him both for his cricketing skills and his right to make personal choices regarding his faith.
This incident has sparked a larger conversation about the intersection of religion, personal freedom, and professional responsibilities. While some believe public figures like Shami have a duty to set examples, others argue that faith is deeply personal and should not be subject to public scrutiny.
As the debate unfolds, the key question remains: should athletes be judged for not fasting during demanding competitions, or should there be greater understanding of the physical toll their professions take?
Let us know your thoughts — is this a matter of personal choice or public responsibility?